About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)
is not gng to go away. adam and steve are not going to be married if the supreme court goes against it. there's going to be children that are children of gay couples that are still going to exist. we're still going to have the practical issue to deal with. are we going to tell those children that their family is deserving of less recognition or that they come from a dysfunctional family? are we going to tell that couple that they have less of a right to love each other? so this issue is not going to go away. we have to remember, let's put a name and face to this, the case that's going in front of the supreme court edith winsler, 83 years old, spent 40 years with her partner thea. if thea had been theo, edith winsler would not have had to pay the $600,000 in estate taxes she had to pay when her partner died. that's what we're talking about. that's the kind of equality, but regardless of what the court decides, edith and thea are still going to love each other and still going to be a couple. >> the thing is that edith and t he a don't want separate but equal treatment under the law when it come
i'll call for steve or or john from el paso county sheriff's office. >> inspect john st. augustine with the el paso county sheriff's office. i want to first begin by -- >> all right. you're listening to a press conference there in texas as authorities are talking about how they are cooperating in texas with colorado authorities as they try to look into these two separate shooting incidents and trying to determine whether indeed there is a link between the person, the suspect who was -- who died who was shot and killed there in texas and if there's a link between that person and the corrections chief that was shot right outside his home in colorado springs. let's go to jim spellman once again joining us there in colorado springs. again, jim, give us an idea of where authorities are going from here as they try to draw a connection between these two situations. >> first thing they want to do is see if they can link any evidence found at the crime scene of the tom clements murder here in colorado with that car. i asked does that mean shell ka casings, fingerprints, but they wopt tell m
. steve harvey has ask steve. wendy williams has ask wendy. they're all giving advice on television. what does this mean if anything? >> the first thing i'll say, ryan, is this lawsuit has no legs much less feet. how do you like that one? the issue is this. this would establish a parade of hosh horribles. that means any attorney who has a talk show regarding law you're going to sue them for malpractice? a doctor dispensing advice, you're suing them? you have a financial adviser or planner. you're suing them? the law is concerned about imposing a legal duty even and i think they'll look to have the case dismissed on that ground. >> they should -- this show at the very least should have a disclaimer at the end saying we're not giving medical advice. please consult a doctor before trying any of this. i don't see the doctor-patient relationship. dr. oz didn't know his particular condition. also, you mentioned he said wear it for 20 minutes. this guy fell asleep with them and woke up and had these bruises. that is a problem. in cases like this when you talk about what i assume is going to be m
anymore. steve alan, jimmy carson, that was back in the day. it is almost irrelevant now. now you have jay leno, and look, nobody feels sorry for jay leno. he's loaded. it is time for him to wrap it up. >> you know what, jay leno, for some reason or other, listen, people, especially comedians, late night talk show hosts, they don't have a lot of nice things to say about jay leno. >> nobody likes him. >> it is because jay leno coming up was the coolest. when he was on carson, he would go on letterman's show, jay leno was awesome. he slowly sanded down every edge he had to become this milquetoast -- i mean, i wouldn't mind -- you would hear, like, those headlines, jay leno is attacking nbc in his monologue, you think that's exciting. you hear the jokes. god, i wish they were good jokes. it is terrible. and so the reason why the tonight show is irrelevant, it is because of jay leno. saturday night live is still relevant years and years and years later. and -- >> is it because of the format. listen, the "today" show was the most popular show, now it is not doing so well. is it the format of "t
steve allen, jack parr and johnny carson held court. in 1972, carson, looking for easier access to hollywood guests, took the show to the west coast. why go back to new york? >> that's his comfort zone, where lauren michaels, who over seas his show is, these days, air travel is a lot easier and a lot of stars are in new york as well. so i don't think that will hurt him too much. >> reporter: l.a. times writer joe flint says don't forget that other jimmy. >> advertisers pay more for younger viewers and jimmy kimmel, since moving to 11:30 fr midnight is making inroads in that audience. nbc wants to get fallon in there sooner rather than later before kimmel gets too established. >> reporter: kimmel spoke to jake tapper about fallon taking over "the tonight show." >> there is talk about mr. leno's departure, although i've read those stories before. >> i know. you read stories and really never know if they are true or not, unless you hear it from somebody over there. >> it has to be a direct response to you coming and -- >> god, i hope so. i really hope. i don't know. i mean, i have
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)